Advertisement

Optimizing a Surgical Practice from Start to Finish

Published:September 28, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aan.2021.07.004
      Practice optimization is important to the viability of value-based surgical practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Advances in Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. OECD. Health at a Glance 2019. doi:Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/4dd50c09-en. Accessed August 24, 2021.

        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        National Health Expenditure Data. CMS.gov.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 29, 2021)
        • Vetter T.R.
        • Ivankova N.V.
        • Goeddel L.A.
        • et al.
        An analysis of methodologies that can be used to validate if a perioperative surgical home improves the patient-centeredness, evidence-based practice, quality, safety, and value of patient care.
        Anesthesiology. 2013; 119: 1261-1274
        • Cooper R.L.
        • Fogarty-Mack P.
        • Kroll H.R.
        • et al.
        Medication safety in anesthesia: epidemiology, causes, and lessons learned in achieving reliable patient outcomes.
        Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2019; 57: 78-95
        • Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in A
        Kohn L.T. Corrigan J.M. Donaldson M.S. To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC2000
        • Koenig K.M.
        • Bozic K.J.
        Orthopaedic Healthcare Worldwide: the role of standardization in improving outcomes.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 3360-3363
        • Bodenheimer T.
        • Sinsky C.
        From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.
        Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12: 573-576
        • Hayes C.W.
        • Batalden P.B.
        • Goldmann D.
        A 'work smarter, not harder' approach to improving healthcare quality.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24: 100-102
      2. Vetter TR, Bader AM. Continued evolution of perioperative medicine: realizing its full potential. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2020;130(4):808-10.

        • Raphael D.R.
        • Tran P.T.
        • Kain Z.N.
        • et al.
        Two-year follow-up survey: views of US anesthesiologists about health care costs and future practice roles.
        Anesth Analg. 2018; 126: 611-614
        • Duncan M.J.
        Perioperative surgical home, fixing a fragmented process to improve quality of care.
        Mo Med. 2019; 116: 53
        • Cannesson M.
        • Mahajan A.
        Vertical and horizontal pathways: intersection and integration of enhanced recovery after surgery and the perioperative surgical home.
        Anesth Analgesia. 2018; 127: 1275-1277
        • Pozek J.J.
        • De Ruyter M.
        • Khan T.W.
        Comprehensive Acute Pain Management in the Perioperative Surgical Home.
        Anesthesiol Clin. 2018; 36: 295-307
        • Merchea A.
        • Larson D.W.
        Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Future Directions.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2018; 98: 1287-1292
        • Schweitzer M.
        Anesthesiology’s Future with Specialists in Population Health.
        Anesthesiology Clin. 2018; 36: 309-320
        • Szokol J.W.
        • Chamberlin K.J.
        Value Proposition and Anesthesiology.
        Anesthesiology Clin. 2018; 36: 227-239
        • Wyles C.C.
        • Smith H.M.
        • Amundson A.W.
        • et al.
        Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesiology Surgical Improvement Strategies Project: Phase I Outcomes.
        The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 823-829
        • Wyles C.C.
        • Abdel M.P.
        • Amundson A.W.
        • et al.
        Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesiology Surgical Improvement Strategies Project --Phase II Outcomes.
        The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 1849-1856
        • Rakover J.
        • Little K.
        • Scoville R.
        • et al.
        Implementing Daily Management Systems to Support Sustained Quality Improvement in Ambulatory Surgery Centers.
        AORN J. 2020; 111: 415-422
        • deVries C.R.
        • Rosenberg J.S.
        Global surgical ecosystems: a need for systems strengthening.
        Ann Glob Health. 2016; 82: 605-613
        • Foster T.C.
        • Johnson J.K.
        • Nelson E.C.
        • et al.
        Using a Malcolm Baldrige framework to understand high-performing clinical microsystems.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16: 334-341
      3. Pöppelbuß J, Röglinger M. What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. ECIS 2011;Proceedings 28.

      4. Albliwi S A, et.al. Critical literature review on maturity models for business process excellence. Paper presented at: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management2014. Malaysia, December 9-12, 2014.

        • Orchard C.
        • Pederson L.L.
        • Read E.
        • et al.
        Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): further testing and instrument revision.
        J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2018; 38: 11-18
        • Kang J.Y.
        • Lee M.K.
        • Fairchild E.M.
        • et al.
        Relationships Among Organizational Values, Employee Engagement, and Patient Satisfaction in an Academic Medical Center.
        Mayo Clinic Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020; 4: 8-20
      5. Toussaint JS, Berry LL. The promise of Lean in health care. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88(1):74–82.

        • Aij K.H.
        • Teunissen M.
        Lean leadership attributes: a systematic review of the literature.
        J Health Organ Manag. 2017;
        • Cox M.
        • Sandberg K.
        Modeling causal relationships in quality improvement.
        Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2018; 48: 182-185
        • Lowes L.P.
        • Noritz G.H.
        • Newmeyer A.
        • et al.
        ‘Learn From Every Patient’: implementation and early results of a learning health system.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017; 59: 183-191
        • Mate K.S.
        • Rakover J.
        • Cordiner K.
        • et al.
        A simple way to involve frontline clinicians in managing costs.
        Harv Business Rev. 2017; 11
        • Kreindler S.A.
        Six ways not to improve patient flow: a qualitative study.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; 26: 388-394
        • Carr S.
        Editor's notebook: a quotation with a life of its own. Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare. Analyses Web site.
        (Available at:) (Accessed February 26, 2021)
        • Constantinescu A.E.
        The anatomy and physiology of process standardization.
        J Qual Participation. 2020; 42: 34-38
        • Upshaw-Owens M.
        Standardization: a concept analysis.
        Medsurg Nurs. 2019; 28: 132-134
        • Lyngeraa T.
        • Jæger P.
        • Gottschau B.
        • et al.
        Comparison of the analgesic effect of an adductor canal block using a new suture-method catheter vs. standard perineural catheter vs. single-injection: a randomised, blinded, controlled study.
        Anaesthesia. 2019; 74: 1397-1405
        • Deneckere S.
        • Euwema M.
        • Lodewijckx C.
        • et al.
        Better interprofessional teamwork, higher level of organized care, and lower risk of burnout in acute health care teams using care pathways: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
        Med Care. 2013; 51: 99-107
        • Mills P.
        • Neily J.
        • Dunn E.
        Teamwork and communication in surgical teams: implications for patient safety.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206: 107-112
        • Paull D.E.
        • Mazzia L.M.
        • Wood S.D.
        • et al.
        Briefing guide study: preoperative briefing and postoperative debriefing checklists in the Veterans Health Administration medical team training program.
        Am J Surg. 2010; 200: 620-623
        • Adam M.B.
        • Minyenya-Njuguna J.
        • Karuri Kamiru W.
        • et al.
        Implementation research and human-centred design: how theory driven human-centred design can sustain trust in complex health systems, support measurement and drive sustained community health volunteer engagement.
        Health Policy Plan. 2020; 35: ii150-ii162
        • Roberts J.P.
        • Fisher T.R.
        • Trowbridge M.J.
        • et al.
        design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation.
        Healthc (Amst). 2016; 4: 11-14
        • Hall D.
        • James D.
        • Marsden N.
        Marginal gains: Olympic lessons in high performance for organisations.
        HR Bull Res Pract. 2012; 7: 9-13
        • Carli F.
        Prehabilitation for the anesthesiologist.
        Anesthesiology. 2020; 133: 645-652
        • Aronson S.
        • Murray S.
        • Martin G.
        • et al.
        Roadmap for transforming preoperative assessment to preoperative optimization.
        Anesth Analg. 2020; 130: 811-819